Todos los casos de uso

Revisión de código de PR con inteligencia artificial

Zero lee el diff de su PR, marca problemas críticos como P0, clasifica oportunidades de mejora y los reporta en Slack para que su equipo actúe antes del merge.

Zero conecta:SlackGitHub

Lo que Zero entrega

Cuál es el problema

PRs pile up. Reviewers are busy. Someone hits 'approve' to clear their queue and a subtle bug ships. Zero gives every PR a thorough read without the queue. Point it at any PR number, and it returns a structured review - critical issues that must be fixed before merge, plus lower-priority suggestions - posted directly in Slack.

Cómo lo resuelve Zero

Paso 1: Conecta tus herramientas

GitHub
GitHub
Obligatorio
GitHub is required. Zero needs read access to pull requests and the full diff.
Conectar
Slack
Slack
Opcional
Slack is where the review request is made and where findings are delivered.
Conectar

Paso 2: Pregúntale a Zero

@Zero review vm0-ai/vm0#8886
Zero reads the full diff
Zero fetches the PR via GitHub, reads every changed file, and understands the intent of the change from the PR title, description, and commit messages.
Zero ranks issues by severity
Findings are classified as P0 (must fix before merge - bugs, security issues, silent failures) or P1 (improvements - better error handling, test coverage, naming).
Review posted to Slack
Zero posts the full review in the Slack thread where it was requested, with specific file references and line numbers so the author knows exactly what to fix.

Paso 3: Llévalo más lejos

Create a GitHub issue from a finding
Log a P0 as a tracked issue if it can't be fixed immediately
@Zero create a GitHub issue for the P0 in that review. Assign to Ethan and label as bug, priority-high.
Re-review after changes
Verify that P0 feedback was addressed
@Zero re-review #8886, second commit - confirm the P0 is resolved.
Check CI status
See if all checks pass before merging
@Zero what's the CI status on vm0-ai/vm0#8886? Is it safe to merge?

Consejos para mejores resultados

Include the specific concern in your prompt - 'focus on auth changes' or 'check for race conditions' - to get a more targeted review than a general diff scan.
Use re-review for iterative PRs. After the author pushes fixes, ask Zero to re-check only the P0 items to confirm they're resolved.
Set a team norm: Zero review before any merge to main. It catches the class of issues that slip through async human review.